A bet on a smaller LLM model that actually know Polish law

A bet on a smaller LLM model that actually know Polish law

A bet on a smaller LLM model that actually know Polish law

Stage

Startup

Stage

Startup

Industry

Legal Ai

Industry

Legal Ai

Timeline

Sep 2025 – Sep 2026

Timeline

Sep 2025 – Sep 2026

context

At the beginning I thought we were competing with other legal AI companies. It soon became clear how wrong I was, as every lawyer was using GPT, Gemini or Perplexity.

But wait, were they satisfied?
What could we do better than big tech?

context

At the beginning I thought we were competing with other legal AI companies. It soon became clear how wrong I was, as every lawyer was using GPT, Gemini or Perplexity.

But wait, were they satisfied?
What could we do better than big tech?

goal

In Sep 2025, Gaius had a team of five and a major problem with usability.

  • App’s language was very technical

  • The visual hierarchy was poor

  • and we didn’t know exactly what kind of person we serve

but

the value was working 🎉

50 law firms were paying to find the right supreme court case reference, a source based on their line of case law or similar facts. And that's something I would call a great beginning.


After couple of weeks of talking with clients (not only about sales) I knew exactly with what expectations they came:

  • Quicker legal research without hallucination

  • Upload documents with sensitive data without worry

  • “proper” Ai answers

Wait, what 'proper Ai' answer even means?
Of course it depends.
But we can still test the assumptions.

goal

In Sep 2025, Gaius had a team of five and a major problem with usability.

  • App’s language was very technical

  • The visual hierarchy was poor

  • and we didn’t know exactly what kind of person we serve

but

the value was working 🎉

50 law firms were paying to find the right supreme court case reference, a source based on their line of case law or similar facts. And that's something I would call a great beginning.


After couple of weeks of talking with clients (not only about sales) I knew exactly with what expectations they came:

  • Quicker legal research without hallucination

  • Upload documents with sensitive data without worry

  • “proper” Ai answers

Wait, what 'proper Ai' answer even means?
Of course it depends.
But we can still test the assumptions.

Challenges

Although Gaius-Lex offered dedicated workflows for legal professionals, a vast majority of users came looking for one thing: an AI assistant they could trust.

Unpredictable technology

The biggest challenge was fighting with models themselves. There were days were bugs surprised us each morning. A prompt that worked yesterday could fail a day after.

The expectation gap

Users expected the speed, quality, and pricing of products backed by multi-billion-dollar investments.

Everyone uses AI, no one understands it

People expected prompts like "Don't hallucinate the law" to guarantee accurate answers.
Others believed telling chat to "delete sensitive information” meant fulfilling their confidentiality obligations. Some expected the AI to "write more like a human" without providing examples or teaching the system what "human" meant for them.

Each ‘user error’ is a design opportunity.

Challenges

Although Gaius-Lex offered dedicated workflows for legal professionals, a vast majority of users came looking for one thing: an AI assistant they could trust.

Unpredictable technology

The biggest challenge was fighting with models themselves. There were days were bugs surprised us each morning. A prompt that worked yesterday could fail a day after.

The expectation gap

Users expected the speed, quality, and pricing of products backed by multi-billion-dollar investments.

Everyone uses AI, no one understands it

People expected prompts like "Don't hallucinate the law" to guarantee accurate answers.
Others believed telling chat to "delete sensitive information” meant fulfilling their confidentiality obligations. Some expected the AI to "write more like a human" without providing examples or teaching the system what "human" meant for them.

Each ‘user error’ is a design opportunity.

My impact

  • Identified friction points in the core user journey

    • Introduced a reactivation flow ("remind me about Gaius") alongside subscription-cancellation, used by 1 in 4 clients

  • Converting a multitude of unintuitive features into a cohesive application

    • Redesigned the interaction model between users and the sLLM-based agent, increasing the first-message rate by +31.6% absolute improvement (from 39.8% in Feb to → 71.4 % in June 2026) by new signups.

  • Ran small-scale tests instead of shipping full features

    • I discovered that token count was irrelevant to users until they ran out (validated via client conversations and smoke tests) which let us cut 20% of backlog tied to token-limit tasks

My impact

  • Identified friction points in the core user journey

    • Introduced a reactivation flow ("remind me about Gaius") alongside subscription-cancellation, used by 1 in 4 clients

  • Converting a multitude of unintuitive features into a cohesive application

    • Redesigned the interaction model between users and the sLLM-based agent, increasing the first-message rate by +31.6% absolute improvement (from 39.8% in Feb to → 71.4 % in June 2026) by new signups.

  • Ran small-scale tests instead of shipping full features

    • I discovered that token count was irrelevant to users until they ran out (validated via client conversations and smoke tests) which let us cut 20% of backlog tied to token-limit tasks

Get in touch

Local time in Gdańsk, Poland

6:37 PM

🇵🇱 🇪🇺

© 2025 Fembot Studio 👾 by Zuzanna Adamczyk. All rights reserved.

Get in touch

Local time in Gdańsk, Poland

6:37 PM

🇵🇱 🇪🇺

© 2025 Fembot Studio 👾 by Zuzanna Adamczyk. All rights reserved.

Get in touch

Local time in Gdańsk, Poland

6:37 PM

🇵🇱 🇪🇺

© 2025 Fembot Studio 👾 by Zuzanna Adamczyk. All rights reserved.

Create a free website with Framer, the website builder loved by startups, designers and agencies.